Machine Learning Models for Intelligent Test Data Generation in Financial Technologies: Techniques, Tools, and Case Studies

Authors

  • Amsa Selvaraj Amtech Analytics, USA Author
  • Chandrashekar Althati Medalogix, USA Author
  • Jegatheeswari Perumalsamy Athene Annuity and Life company Author

Keywords:

Machine Learning

Abstract

The burgeoning field of financial technology (FinTech) thrives on sophisticated algorithms that analyze vast swathes of financial data to inform critical decisions. However, the efficacy of these algorithms hinges on robust testing methodologies that utilize high-quality test data. Traditionally, acquiring real-world financial data for testing poses significant challenges. Regulatory constraints, privacy concerns, and data scarcity often impede access to comprehensive datasets. Furthermore, real-world data may not encompass the full spectrum of potential scenarios, particularly edge cases or extreme events, which are crucial for ensuring system robustness.

This research paper delves into the burgeoning application of machine learning (ML) models for intelligent test data generation in FinTech. We posit that ML offers a compelling solution to overcome the limitations of traditional test data acquisition methods. By leveraging the power of pattern recognition and statistical learning, ML models can be trained on existing financial datasets to generate synthetic data that closely resembles real-world data distributions and relationships. This synthetic test data can then be employed to rigorously evaluate the performance of FinTech algorithms across a diverse range of scenarios.

The paper commences with a comprehensive overview of the challenges associated with traditional test data acquisition in FinTech. We discuss the regulatory and privacy constraints that often restrict access to sensitive financial data. Additionally, we explore the limitations of using historical data for testing, particularly its inability to capture unforeseen events or edge cases. Subsequently, we introduce the concept of intelligent test data generation using machine learning models.

We delve into various techniques employed in ML-powered test data generation for FinTech applications. A prominent technique involves utilizing regression models to generate numerical test data, such as stock prices, interest rates, or loan amounts. These models learn the underlying relationships within historical data and extrapolate to create realistic numerical values for test scenarios. Furthermore, classification models can be employed to generate categorical test data, such as customer classifications or transaction types. By analyzing existing data patterns, these models can predict and generate new data points that fall within specific categories.

For generating complex and multifaceted synthetic data, generative models offer a powerful approach. Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) have emerged as a prevalent technique in this domain. GANs consist of two competing neural networks: a generative model that learns to create synthetic data, and a discriminative model that attempts to distinguish synthetic data from real data. Through an iterative training process, the generative model refines its ability to produce synthetic data that closely mimics the real-world data distribution, ultimately fooling the discriminative model. Another noteworthy approach involves Variational Autoencoders (VAEs). VAEs function by compressing data into a latent space, which captures the underlying data structure. New data points can then be generated by sampling from the latent space and reconstructing them using the decoder network.

The paper then explores the implementation of these techniques in various FinTech use cases. One critical application lies in credit risk assessment. By generating synthetic customer profiles with varying creditworthiness, ML models can be rigorously tested to ensure their accuracy in predicting loan defaults. Similarly, in fraud detection, synthetic transaction data encompassing both legitimate and fraudulent activities can be generated to evaluate the efficacy of fraud detection algorithms in identifying anomalous patterns. Furthermore, the realm of algorithmic trading can benefit significantly from intelligent test data generation. Synthetic market data encompassing diverse market conditions can be employed to test and refine algorithmic trading strategies, ensuring their robustness across various market scenarios.

We present a detailed analysis of case studies that showcase successful implementations of ML-powered test data generation in FinTech. These case studies will critically evaluate the effectiveness of different ML techniques in specific FinTech applications. Metrics employed for evaluation will include the data quality of the synthetic data, the performance of FinTech algorithms when tested with synthetic data, and the overall impact on the testing process.

The paper concludes by discussing the potential benefits and limitations of using ML for intelligent test data generation in FinTech. We emphasize the advantages of this approach in overcoming data scarcity challenges and facilitating comprehensive testing across diverse scenarios. However, we acknowledge the limitations associated with model bias and the need for rigorous validation to ensure the quality and representativeness of synthetic data. Finally, we propose avenues for future research in this domain, including advancements in model interpretability, addressing potential biases, and exploring the integration of domain knowledge to enhance synthetic data generation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

IEEE Referencing Style Guide for Authors http://journals.ieeeauthorcenter.ieee.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/IEEE_Reference_Guide.pdf

Ian J. Goodfellow, Jean-Sébastien Pouget-Abadie, Mehdi Mirza, Bing Xu, Aaron Courville, and Yoshua Bengio. Generative adversarial nets. In Advances in neural information processing systems, pp. 2672-2680, 2014.

Mehdi Mirza and Simon Osindero. Conditional generative adversarial nets. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.2661, 2014.

Alec Radford, Luke Metz, and Soumith Chintala. Unsupervised representation learning with deep convolutional generative adversarial networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.06434, 2015.

Diederik P. Kingma and Max Welling. Auto-encoding variational bayes. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6114, 2013.

Lars Mescheler and Christopher M Bishop. Variational autoencoders for conditional independence. arXiv preprint arXiv:1111.1555, 2011.

Irina Higgins, Loic Matthey, Alistair Palيكبety, Christopher Burgess, Xavier Glorot, Matthew Botvinick, Sylvain Bengio, and Aaron Courville. beta-vae: Learning basic visual concepts with a variational autoencoder. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.06596, 2016.

John Schmidhuber. Deep learning in neural networks: An overview. Neural networks, 41(1):85-117, 2014.

Sepp Hochreiter and Jürgen Schmidhuber. Long short-term memory. Neural computation, 9(8):1735-1780, 1997.

Kyunghyun Cho, Bart van Merriënboer, Caglar Gulcehre, Dzmitry Bahdanau, Kyunghyun Hinton, and Yoshua Bengio. Learning phrase representations using rnn encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.1078, 2014.

Ernest Chan. Algorithmic trading: winning strategies and their implementation. John Wiley & Sons, 2013.

Marco Avellaneda and Harris Lau. Quantitative trading. John Wiley & Sons, 2017.

Ernest Chan, Nuno Fernandes, and Raquel Gerೃais. Machine learning for algorithmic trading. John Wiley & Sons, 2018.

Thomas H. Ripley. Statistical aspects of risk analysis. Chapman and Hall, 1996.

Philip J. Heckman and Edward J. Imbens. Instrumental variables: A guide for the impatient. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(1):35-44, 2002.

Luis C. Canon and David R. Crook. A review of credit scoring techniques. Journal of operational research society, 57(11):1405-1417, 2006.

Warren S. McCulloch and Walter Pitts. A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. The bulletin of mathematical biophysics, 5(4):115-137, 1943.

Ofer Maimon, Lior Rokach, and Eytan Villányi. The knowledge grid: a framework for knowledge representation and reasoning. Machine learning, 80(2):291-331, 2010.

Colleen Ruth and Shashi Shekhar. A survey of multi-domain anomaly detection techniques. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 26(12):2665-2678, 2014.

Philipp Krämer, Lars M. Pape, and Oliver Steffens. Generating synthetic social network data. Computer Networks, 51(16):4233-4249

Downloads

Published

2024-02-14

How to Cite

[1]
Amsa Selvaraj, Chandrashekar Althati, and Jegatheeswari Perumalsamy, “Machine Learning Models for Intelligent Test Data Generation in Financial Technologies: Techniques, Tools, and Case Studies”, J. of Artificial Int. Research and App., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 363–397, Feb. 2024, Accessed: Sep. 18, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://aimlstudies.co.uk/index.php/jaira/article/view/158

Similar Articles

1-10 of 79

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.