AI and Machine Learning Techniques for Automated Test Data Generation in FinTech: Enhancing Accuracy and Efficiency
Keywords:
Automated Test Data Generation (ATDG)Abstract
The financial technology (FinTech) sector has witnessed exponential growth in recent years, driven by the increasing adoption of mobile and digital financial services. This rapid innovation necessitates robust software testing processes to ensure the reliability, security, and regulatory compliance of FinTech applications. However, conventional manual test data generation methods are often time-consuming, labor-intensive, and prone to human error. This paper investigates the application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) techniques for Automated Test Data Generation (ATDG) in FinTech, with a focus on enhancing accuracy and efficiency in the software testing lifecycle.
The paper commences with a comprehensive overview of the FinTech landscape, highlighting the critical role of software testing in safeguarding the integrity and security of financial transactions. It then delves into the limitations of traditional manual test data generation approaches, emphasizing their ineffectiveness in covering the vast and intricate data landscape of FinTech applications.
Subsequently, the paper explores the potential of AI and ML algorithms in automating test data generation. It provides an in-depth analysis of various ML techniques, including supervised learning, unsupervised learning, and reinforcement learning, along with their specific applications in generating realistic and comprehensive test datasets for FinTech software. Techniques such as decision trees, support vector machines, and neural networks are explored for their ability to learn from existing financial data and user behavior patterns to create test scenarios that effectively simulate real-world conditions.
One particular area of focus is the application of Deep Learning (DL) for ATDG in FinTech. The paper examines the power of Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) in generating synthetic financial data that closely resembles real-world data distributions. This capability is crucial for testing edge cases and uncovering potential security vulnerabilities that might be missed by traditional methods.
The paper further emphasizes the importance of data quality and domain expertise in building effective AI/ML-powered ATDG solutions for FinTech. It highlights the need for robust data pre-processing techniques to ensure the quality and relevance of training data for the ML models. Additionally, the paper underscores the significance of incorporating domain-specific knowledge into the training process to enable the models to generate test data that adheres to regulatory requirements and accurately reflects financial transactions.
A critical aspect of the paper is the evaluation of the effectiveness of AI/ML-based ATDG techniques. It discusses various metrics and methodologies for assessing the quality and efficiency of generated test data. These metrics encompass test data coverage, fault detection rate, and reduction in testing time compared to traditional methods. The paper also acknowledges the potential challenges associated with implementing AI/ML for ATDG in FinTech, such as the explainability of model decisions and the potential for bias in the training data.
By leveraging AI and ML, ATDG solutions can significantly enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of software testing in FinTech. The paper concludes by outlining the future directions of research in this domain, including the exploration of hybrid AI/ML approaches that combine different techniques for even more comprehensive test data generation. Additionally, it emphasizes the need for continuous research and development to ensure that AI/ML-based ATDG solutions remain adaptable to the evolving FinTech landscape and address emerging security threats.
In essence, this paper presents a compelling argument for the adoption of AI and ML techniques in ATDG for FinTech applications. By automating the test data generation process, FinTech companies can achieve faster release cycles, mitigate financial risks, and ensure regulatory compliance while delivering secure and reliable financial services to their customers.
Downloads
References
IEEE Reference Style Guide for Authors http://journals.ieeeauthorcenter.ieee.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/IEEE_Reference_Guide.pdf
D. G. Montañez, I. T. Castro, & A. S. Lazo (2020, July). A survey on explainable artificial intelligence for software engineering. In 2020 44th IEEE Software Engineering Workshop (SEW) (pp. 122-129). IEEE.
X. Liu, M. Wu, Y. Zhu, & S. Wang (2016, August). Quality control in machine learning: A review. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE) (pp. 1143-1148). IEEE.
Y. Sun, X. Wu, & Y. Liu (2007, June). Mlearn: A learning framework for collaborative data cleaning. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 748-756).
M. Harman, A. Hinchey, L. Naish, & B. Stewart (2010). Model-based test data generation: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 43(1), 1-53.
Y. Mao, M. Wu, & Y. Liu (2018, July). DeepRoad: A deep learning framework for generating diverse and realistic highway driving scenarios. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining (pp. 1885-1894).
M. Harman, S. Yoo, & S. Zhang (2012, July). A survey of evolutionary testing techniques. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 45(2), 1-52.
R. Kumar, A. Drankov, S. Calatrava, & S. Bakhtiari (2019, April). Machine learning for FinTech: Challenges and opportunities. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Machine Learning (ICCIML) (pp. 1126-1133). IEEE.
A. S. Abdul Rahim & Z. A. Bakar (2018, November). Regulatory technology (RegTech) for financial inclusion in developing economies. Journal of Islamic Banking and Finance, 34(3), 1-22.
M. Fabian, S. Hackethal, & J. Haskins (2019). The innovation imperative in financial services: How FinTech is changing the rules. McKinsey & Company.
N. Tillmann & J. De Halleux (2008, June). Pex: White box test generation for .NET. In Proceedings of the 23rd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) (pp. 109-118).
S. Rapps & S. Dwyer (2002, November). Extended finite state models for test case generation. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis (ISSTA) (pp. 219-229).
P. Ammann & J. Offutt (2017). Introduction to software testing. Cambridge University Press.
