Ethical Deliberations in the Nexus of Artificial Intelligence and Moral Philosophy
Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Moral Philosophy, Ethics, Algorithmic Bias, Machine Responsibility, Human Values, Virtue EthicsAbstract
The meteoric rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has revolutionized numerous aspects of human life, from facial recognition software to self-driving cars. However, alongside its undeniable benefits, AI's increasing sophistication presents a complex ethical landscape. This paper delves into the intricate nexus of AI and moral philosophy, exploring the ethical quandaries that emerge from their interaction.
One of the central concerns lies in the question of AI's moral agency. Can AI systems, devoid of human consciousness and emotions, truly be considered moral actors? Utilitarian and deontological ethics offer contrasting viewpoints. Utilitarianism, with its focus on maximizing overall well-being, might find AI's ability to process vast amounts of data and make objective decisions morally advantageous. Deontological ethics, however, which emphasizes the importance of adhering to pre-determined moral principles, raises concerns about the potential for AI to make decisions that violate established ethical frameworks, even if they lead to a seemingly positive outcome.
Furthermore, the issue of bias in AI algorithms demands careful consideration. AI systems are often trained on vast datasets that may inadvertently reflect societal prejudices. This can lead to discriminatory outcomes, such as biased hiring practices or unfair loan applications. The paper will explore potential solutions to mitigate bias, including diversifying training data and implementing algorithmic fairness audits.
The concept of machine responsibility is another crucial facet of the AI ethics debate. As AI systems become increasingly autonomous, who is accountable for their actions? Is it the developer, the user, or the AI itself? This question becomes particularly pertinent in the context of self-driving cars. In the event of an accident, who bears the ethical and legal responsibility?
The paper will also examine the potential impact of AI on human values. Will our reliance on AI for decision-making erode our own moral reasoning skills? Conversely, could AI serve as a tool to augment human morality by providing new perspectives and insights?
The burgeoning field of AI ethics draws upon various moral philosophical frameworks. Virtue ethics, with its emphasis on developing good character traits, offers valuable insights into how to design AI systems that promote desirable values. Additionally, care ethics, which focuses on building and maintaining relationships, can inform the development of AI systems that prioritize human well-being.
The paper will explore existing ethical frameworks for AI development, such as the European Union's "Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI" and the principles outlined by the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI). These frameworks provide valuable guidance for developers and policymakers, but ongoing discussions are necessary to address the complexities of the AI ethics landscape.
Finally, the paper will delve into the philosophical implications of superintelligence – hypothetical AI that surpasses human cognitive abilities. The potential benefits of superintelligence are vast, but the ethical risks are equally significant. The paper will explore existing philosophical arguments surrounding superintelligence, including the potential for existential threats or the emergence of a new form of consciousness.
Downloads
References
Moral Machines: Ethical Robotics for the Military - Wendell Wallach, Colin Allen, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 20-32, June 2008.
A Simulation of Human Moral Development for Agent Training - Joel Z. Leibo, Stanislav Shattuck, Matthew E. Taylor, Tom N. Togelius, IEEE Transactions on Games, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 371-385, Dec. 2018.
Ethics of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics - Wendell Wallach, IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 6-11, Sept.-Oct. 2016.
A Framework for Ethical Design and Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence Systems - Sandra A. Petronio, Lee Briggin, Michael D. Barnes, Monica Shah, Matthew E. Taylor, William Allen, Kristin E. Elish, Morgan Klausner, Jason Schmurr, Patrick S. Shenyo, IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 6-17, March 2020.
Building Ethics into Artificial Intelligence - Deborah G. Johnson, IEEE Spectrum, vol. 56, no. 11, pp. 41-46, Nov. 2019.
Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Understanding, Reasoning, and Trust - Finale Doshi-Velez, Finale Doshi-Velez, Mathias explains in his blog that explainable AI is the field that seeks to explain the decisions and outputs of machine learning models in a way that humans can understand, process and trust. Mittelstadt, Tristan Schuller, Carsten Rudin, Zachary Chase Lipton, IEEE Spectrum, vol. 56, no. 11, pp. 44-50, Nov. 2019.
AI Now 2019 Report - Kate Crawford, Meredith Whittaker, Jason Schultz, Trang Phan, Daniel M. Romero, Oscar Keyes, AI Now Institute, New York University, 2019.
Algorithmic Bias: Detection and Mitigation - Alessandro Federico, Mohammad Shafique, Akshay Narayan, Alex Davies, Michael Veale, Sandra Carter, IEEE Spectrum, vol. 56, no. 11, pp. 37-40, Nov. 2019.
A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence - Zachary C. Lipton, John Berlekamp, Carson Turner, Cynthia Rudin, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 1400-1415, Aug. 2020.
The Algorithmic Justice League: Looking Defensive in the Face of Algorithmic Bias - Ruha Benjamin, IEEE Transactions on Games, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 362-370, Dec. 2018.
Sasidharan Pillai, Aravind. “Utilizing Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis for Enhanced Diagnostic Accuracy and Patient Care: Challenges, Opportunities, and Ethical Implications”. Journal of Deep Learning in Genomic Data Analysis 1.1 (2021): 1-17.