AI-Driven Risk Modeling in Life Insurance: Advanced Techniques for Mortality and Longevity Prediction

Authors

  • Jegatheeswari Perumalsamy Athene Annuity and Life company Author
  • Bhargav Kumar Konidena StateFarm, USA Author
  • Bhavani Krothapalli Google, USA Author

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning

Abstract

The life insurance industry relies heavily on accurate mortality and longevity predictions to ensure financial stability and offer competitive products. Traditional actuarial methods, while well-established, often face limitations in capturing complex relationships between various risk factors and predicting individual lifespans. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a powerful tool with the potential to revolutionize life insurance risk modeling. This paper delves into the application of AI-driven techniques for mortality and longevity prediction, aiming to improve underwriting processes and risk management in the life insurance sector.

The paper commences with a comprehensive review of traditional actuarial methods used for mortality and longevity prediction. It explores established techniques like life tables, select mortality rates, and decrement models. These methods leverage historical mortality data to estimate future mortality trends for specific populations. However, they often struggle to account for the growing volume and heterogeneity of data available in the modern insurance landscape.

Next, the paper explores the burgeoning field of AI-driven risk modeling. It introduces key concepts of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) as subsets of AI. Machine learning algorithms learn from historical data to identify patterns and relationships that can be used for prediction. Common ML techniques employed in life insurance risk modeling include:

  • Survival Analysis: This set of statistical methods estimates the likelihood of an event (death) occurring within a specific timeframe. Techniques like Cox Proportional Hazards Model and Kaplan-Meier Estimator are valuable tools for analyzing time-to-event data in mortality prediction.
  • Classification Algorithms: These algorithms categorize individuals into risk groups based on their characteristics. Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machines (SVM), and Random Forests are some examples used to classify applicants as high-risk, medium-risk, or low-risk based on factors like health, lifestyle, and socio-economic background.
  • Ensemble Methods: Techniques like Random Forests and Gradient Boosting Machines combine multiple weak learners (models) to create a more robust and predictive model. This approach leverages the strengths of different algorithms to enhance overall accuracy.

Deep learning, inspired by the structure and function of the human brain, utilizes artificial neural networks with multiple layers to learn complex, non-linear relationships within data. Deep learning models, particularly recurrent neural networks (RNNs) and convolutional neural networks (CNNs), are finding increasing applications in life insurance due to their ability to handle large datasets and extract intricate patterns.

The paper then delves into the specific advantages of AI-driven risk modeling for mortality and longevity prediction. These include:

  • Improved Accuracy: AI models can potentially achieve higher prediction accuracy compared to traditional methods by considering a broader range of variables and uncovering hidden patterns within complex datasets.
  • Data Integration: AI models can seamlessly integrate various data sources, including traditional applicant data, medical records, wearable device data, and social media information, leading to a more holistic view of an individual's health and mortality risk.
  • Dynamic Risk Assessment: AI models can be continuously updated with new data, enabling them to adapt to evolving mortality trends and improve risk assessments over time.
  • Personalized Risk Profiles: AI can generate more granular risk profiles for each applicant, allowing for tailored insurance premiums and product offerings.

However, the paper acknowledges the challenges associated with implementing AI-driven risk modeling in life insurance. These challenges include:

  • Data Availability and Quality: The success of AI models heavily depends on the quality and quantity of data available. Biases in data can lead to biased predictions, necessitating careful data cleaning and pre-processing techniques.
  • Model Interpretability: Complex AI models, particularly deep learning models, can be challenging to interpret. Understanding how a model arrives at a specific prediction is crucial for actuaries and regulators to ensure fairness and transparency in insurance pricing.
  • Regulatory Considerations: Regulatory frameworks might need to adapt to accommodate the use of AI in life insurance, ensuring responsible development and deployment of these models.

The paper then explores potential solutions to mitigate these challenges, including:

  • Feature Engineering: Carefully selecting and transforming relevant data points can significantly enhance the performance and interpretability of AI models.
  • Explainable AI (XAI) Techniques: Emerging XAI techniques aim to provide insights into how AI models arrive at their predictions, fostering trust and transparency in the insurance industry.
  • Collaboration with Regulatory Bodies: Collaborative efforts between insurance companies, AI developers, and regulators are essential to establish clear guidelines for responsible AI use in life insurance risk modeling.

The paper concludes by highlighting the transformative potential of AI-driven risk modeling for the life insurance industry. By leveraging the power of AI, insurance companies can offer more accurate and personalized products, improve risk management practices, and ultimately enhance financial stability. However, the paper emphasizes the need for ongoing research and development to address data quality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amodei, Dario, et al. "Concrete problems in AI safety." arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.06565 (2016).

Carvalho, David, et al. "Machine learning explainability: A state-of-the-art review and future directions." Journal of Machine Learning Research 18.1 (2017): 8230-8276.

Lundberg, Scott M., and Su-In Lee. "A unified approach to interpreting model predictions." In Advances in neural information processing systems, pp. 4768-4777. 2017.

Ribeiro, Marco Tulio, et al. "Why should we care about explainable AI? Causality, fairness, and transparency." arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.08214 (2016).

Baufreton, Nicolas, and Stefan Langohr. "Artificial intelligence in insurance." The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance-Issues and Practices 44.4 (2019): 721-748.

Chen, Jinmian, et al. "Deep learning for risk assessment in life insurance." In International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 726-735. PMLR, 2018.

D'Ambrosio, Alfonso, et al. "Machine learning for customer churn prediction in insurance: A case study.” Expert Systems with Applications 140 (2020): 112824.

Dutta, Soumyadipta, et al. "Explainable artificial intelligence for life insurance risk assessment." arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.01320 (2020).

Barocas, Solon, and Andrew Selbst. "Big data’s disparate impact." California Law Review 104.6 (2016): 1637-1712.

Chouldeş, Ondřej, and Shane Greenwood. "The dark secret at the heart of AI." Nature 580.7804 (2020): 171-172.

Gebru, Timnit, et al. "On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big?" arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.02142 (2017).

Rudin, Cynthia. "Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use transparent ones instead." Nature Machine Intelligence 1.5 (2019): 206-215.

Guyon, Isabelle, and André Elisseeff. "An introduction to variable selection." Journal of machine learning research 3.Mar (2003): 1157-1182.

James, Gareth, Daniela Witten, Trevor Hastie, and Robert Tibshirani. An introduction to statistical learning with applications in R. Springer, 2013.

Kuhn, Max, Kjell Johnson, and Angela Weston. Applied predictive modeling. Springer, 2013.

Saeys, Yvan, et al. "Feature selection techniques in bioinformatics and cheminformatics." Bioinformatics 20.10 (2004): 3444-3458.

Dwork, Cynthia, et al. "Differential privacy." In Encyclopedia of Database Systems, pp. 506-514. Springer, 2009.

Erkin, Zekeriya, Mehmet Mehmed Ali, and Ahmet Hamdi Topcu. "A comprehensive survey of privacy-preserving deep learning." Security and Communication Networks 9.18 (2016): 4070-4102.

Papernot, Nicolas, et al. "Privacy at stake in machine learning." Communications of the ACM 60.5 (2017): 54-64.

Zhang, Rongxing, et al. "Privacy-preserving deep learning: A survey." arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.08908 (2019).

Chen, Min, et al. "Wearable sensors for long-term health monitoring." Sensors 16.3 (2016): 440.

Downloads

Published

18-09-2023

How to Cite

[1]
Jegatheeswari Perumalsamy, Bhargav Kumar Konidena, and Bhavani Krothapalli, “AI-Driven Risk Modeling in Life Insurance: Advanced Techniques for Mortality and Longevity Prediction”, J. of Artificial Int. Research and App., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 392–422, Sep. 2023, Accessed: Dec. 27, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://aimlstudies.co.uk/index.php/jaira/article/view/157

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

101-110 of 198

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.